{"id":17,"date":"2017-05-28T10:56:08","date_gmt":"2017-05-28T08:56:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/?page_id=17"},"modified":"2023-02-09T19:53:35","modified_gmt":"2023-02-09T18:53:35","slug":"literatur","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/literatur\/","title":{"rendered":"Literatur"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\"><strong>Literatur zum Thema \u00abWissenschaftstheorie\u00bb<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Die Literaturliste befindet sich noch im Aufbau!<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>(Alphabetisch nach Autorennamen sortiert)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#L-A\">A&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-B\">B&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-C\">C&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-D\">D&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-E\">E&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-F\">F&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-G\">G&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-H\">H&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-K\">K&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-L\">L&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-M\">M&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-N\">N&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-P\">P&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-R\">R&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-S\">S&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-T\">T&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-V\">V&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a> <a href=\"#L-W\">W&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-A\"><\/a>A<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Adams, E. W. (1959). The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics and the Derivation of its Laws from Those of Particle Mechanics, in (Henkin, Suppes, Tarski, 1959), Amsterdam, 250\u2013265.<br>Andreas, H. (2010). A Modal View of the Semantics of Theoretical Sentences. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>174 <\/em>(3), 367\u2013383.<br>Andreas, H. (2010). New Account of Empirical Claims in Structuralism. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>176 <\/em>(3), 311\u2013332.<br>Andreas, H. (2011). A Structuralist Theory of Belief Revision. <em>Journal of Logic, Language, and Information<\/em>, <em>20<\/em>(2), 205\u2013232.<br>Andreas, H. (2013). Deductive Reasoning in the Structuralist Approach. <em>Studia Logica<\/em>, <em>101<\/em>(5), 1093\u20131113.<br>Andreas, H. (2014). Carnapian Structuralism. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>79<\/em>(SB), 1373\u20131391.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-B\"><\/a>B<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Balzer, W. (1979). On the Status of Arithmetic. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>14<\/em>(1), 57\u201385.<br>Balzer, W. (1982). Finality and the Development of Logical Structures of Physical Theories. <em>Epistemologia<\/em>, <em>5<\/em>, 257\u2013268.<br>Balzer, W. (1982). <em>Empirische Theorien: Modelle, Strukturen, Beispiele<\/em>. Vieweg, Braunschweig.<br>Balzer, W. (1985). Incommensurability, Reduction, and Translation. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>23<\/em>(3), 255\u2013267.<br>Balzer, W. (1986). Theoretical Terms, A New Perspective. <em>Journal of Philosophy<\/em>, <em>83<\/em>(2), 71\u201390.<br>Balzer, W., Lauth. B., Zoubek, G. (1993). A Model for Science Kinematics. <em>Studia Logical<\/em>, <em>52<\/em>(4), 519\u2013548.<br>Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U. (eds.) (1996). <em>Structuralist Theory of Science:&nbsp;Focal Issues, New Results. <\/em>de Gruyter, Berlin &#8211; New York.<br>Balzer, W., Pearce, D. A., Schmidt, H.-J. (1984). <em>Reduction in Science: Structure, Examples, Philosophical Problems<\/em>. Reidel, Dordrecht.<br>Balzer, W., Sneed, J. D., Moulines, C. U. (2000). <em>Structuralist Knowledge Representation: Paradigmatic Examples<\/em>. Rodopi, Amsterdam.<br>Balzer, W., Zoubek, G. (1994). Structuralist Aspects of Idealization, in M. Kuokkanen (ed.) <em>Idealization VII: Structuralism, Idealization and Approximation, Poznan Studies<\/em> 42, 57\u201379.<br>Bartelborth, T. (1988). <em>Eine logische Rekonstruktion der klassischen Elektrodynamik<\/em>. Peter Lang, Frankfurt.<br>Bartelborth, T. (1996). Scientific Explanation, in (Balzer &amp; Moulines, 1996). &nbsp;23\u201343.<br>Bartelborth, T. (1996). Hierarchy versus Holism. A Structuralist View of General Relativity. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>39<\/em>(3), 383\u2013412.<br>Bartelborth, T. (1999). Coherence and Explanation. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>50<\/em>(2\/3), 209\u2013224.<br>Bartelborth, T. (1999). Verstehen und Koh\u00e4renz. Ein Beitrag zur Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. <em>Analyse und Kritik<\/em>, <em>21<\/em>(1), 97\u2013116.<br>Bickle, J. (1998). <em>Psychoneural Reduction<\/em>. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.<br>Brecher, M., Wilkenfeld, J., Moser, S. (eds.) (1988). <em>Crisis in the Twentieth Century<\/em>. Zwei B\u00e4nde, Oxford &#8211; New York.<br>Burscheid, H. J. &amp; Struve, H. (2000). The Theory of Stochastic Fairness &#8211; its Historical Development, Formulation and Justification, in (Balzer, Sneed, Moulines, 2000), 69 &#8211; 98.<br>Burscheid, H. J. &amp; Struve, H. (2001). Die Differentialrechnung nach Leibniz &#8211; eine Rekonstruktion, <em>Studia Leibnitiana<\/em> 33, 163 &#8211; 93.<br>Burscheid, H. J. &amp; Struve, H. (2010). <em>Mathmatikdidaktik in Rekonstruktionen<\/em>. Berlin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-C\"><\/a>C<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Carnap, R. (1960). <em>Philosophical Foundations of Physics<\/em>. New York.<br>Carnap, R. 1998 (1928). <em>Der logische Aufbau der Welt<\/em>. Hamburg, Felix Meiner.<br>Cartwright, N. (1983). <em>How the Laws of Physics Lie<\/em>. Oxford, Oxford University Press.<br>Causey R. L. (1972). Uniform Microreductions. <em>Synthese<\/em> <em>25<\/em>(1-2), 176 -218.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-D\"><\/a>D<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Dalla Chiara, M. L. (1997). <em>Structures and Norms in Science<\/em>. Kluwer, Dordrecht.<br>Darden, L. &amp; Maull, N. L. (1977). Interfield Theories, <em>Philosophy of Science<\/em> 44, 43 &#8211; 64.<br>Day, M. (1985). Adams on Theoretical Reduction. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>23<\/em>(2), 161\u2013184.<br>De Bellis, N. (2009). <em>Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis<\/em>: <em>From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics<\/em>. Lanham, Scarerow Press.<br>Diederich, W. (1996). Pragmatic and Diachronic Aspects of Structuralism, in (Balzer &amp; Moulines, 1996), 75\u201382.<br>Diederich, W. (1996). Structuralism as Developed within the Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science, in (Balzer &amp; Moulines, 1996), 15\u201321.<br>Diez, J. A. (2002). A Program for the Individuation of Scientific Concepts. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>130<\/em>(1), 13\u201348.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-E\"><\/a>E<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Eom, S. B. (2009). <em>Author Cocitation Analysis<\/em>: <em>Quantitative Methods for Mapping the Intellectual Structure of an Academic Discipline<\/em>. Hershey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-F\"><\/a>F<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Feyerabend, P. (1975). <em>Against Method<\/em>. New Left Books, London.<br>Field, H. (1980). <em>Science Without Numbers<\/em>. Blackwell, Oxford.<br>Forge, J. (1999). <em>Explanation, Quantity and Law<\/em>. MacMillan, New York.<br>Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and Scientific Understanding, <em>Journal of Philosophy<\/em> 71, 395\u2013419.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-G\"><\/a>G<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>G\u00e4hde, U. (1990). On Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em> 32, 215\u2013233.<br>G\u00e4hde, U. (1996). Holism and the Empirical Claim of Theory-Nets, in: (Balzer &amp; Moulines, 1996), 167\u2013190.<br>G\u00e4hde, U. (1997). Anomalies and the Revision of Theory-Elements: Notes on the Advance of Mercury&#8217;s Perihelion, in: (Dalla Chiara, 1997). 89\u2013104.<br>G\u00e4hde, U. (2002). Holism, Underdetermination, and the Dynamics of Empirical Theories. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>130<\/em>(1), 69\u201390.<br>G\u00e4hde, U. (2014). Theory-Dependent Determination of Base Sets: Implications for the Structuralist Approach. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>79<\/em>(SB), 1459\u20131473.<br>G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1988). <em>Knowledge in Flux<\/em>. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.<br>Glymour, C. (1980). <em>Theory and Evidence<\/em>. Princeton Univeristy Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-H\"><\/a>H<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Hanson, N. R. (1971). <em>Observation and Explanation<\/em>. Harper and Row, London.<br>Hartmann, S. (1995). Models as a Tool for the Theory Construction; Some Strategies of Preliminary Physics, in Herfel, W. E. etc. (eds.) <em>Theories and Models in Scientific Processes<\/em>, Rodopi, Atlanta, 49\u201367.<br>Heinrich, W. (1998). <em>Inexakte Messung und Datenkinematik. Eine wissenschaftliche Untersuchung<\/em>. Frankfurt am Main [u.a.], Peter Lang.<br>Henkin, L., Suppes, P. &amp; Tarski, A. (eds.) (1959). <em>The Axiomatic Method<\/em>. Amsterdam, North-Holland.<br>Hitchcock, C. R. (1996). The Role of Contrast in Causal and Explanatory Claims. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>107<\/em>(3), 395\u2013419.<br>Hitchcock, C. R. (1999). Contrastive Explanation and the Demons of Determinism. <em>British Journal of Philosophy of Science<\/em>, <em>50<\/em>(4), 585\u2013612.<br>Hinst, P. (1996). A Rigorous Set Theoretical Foundations of the Structuralist Approach, in (Balzer &amp; Moulines, 1996), 233\u2013263. Hoering, W. (1984). Anomalies of Reduction, in (Balzer, Pearce, Schmidt, 1984), 33\u201350.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-K\"><\/a>K<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Kitcher, P. (1976). Explanation, Conjunction and Unification. <em>Journal of Philosophy<\/em>, <em>73<\/em>(8), 207\u2013212.<br>Kripke, S. A. (1980). <em>Naming and Necessity<\/em>. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.<br>Kuhn, T. S. (1970). <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolution<\/em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br>Kuhn, T. S. (1990). Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation, in Savage, C. W. (ed.), <em>Scientific Theories<\/em>. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 298\u2013318.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-L\"><\/a>L<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Lakatos, I. (1978). <em>The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes<\/em>. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.<br>Laudan, L. (1977). <em>Progress and its Problems<\/em>: <em>Towards a theory of scientific growth<\/em>. Berkeley, University of California Press.<br>Laudan, L. (1991). Theory Evolution and Reference Kinematics, <em>Synthese<\/em>\u00a088, 279\u2013307.<br>Lauth, B. (2002). Transtheoretical Structures and Deterministic Models. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>130<\/em>(1), 163\u2013172.<br>Lewis, D. (1970). How to Define Theoretical Terms, in Lewis, D. <em>Philosophical Papers I<\/em>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 78\u201395.<br>Lipton, P. (1991). <em>Inference to the Best Explanation<\/em>. Routledge, London.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-M\"><\/a>M<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Mayr, D. (1976). Investigations of the Concept of Reduction I. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>10<\/em>(3), 275\u2013294.<br>Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and Conceptual Structure. <em>The American Psychologist<\/em>, <em>44<\/em>(12), 1469\u20131481.<br>Mormann, T. (1988). Structuralist Reduction Concepts as Structure-Preserving Maps. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>77<\/em>(2), 215\u2013250.<br>Moulines, C. U. (1979). Theory-Nets and the Evolution of Theories: The Example of Newtonian Mechanics. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>41<\/em>(3), 417\u2013439.<br>Moulines, C. U. (1984). Ontological Reduction in the Natural Sciences, in (Balzer, Pearce, Schmidt, 1984), 51\u201370.<br>Moulines, C. U. (1991). Pragmatics in the Structuralist View of Science, in Schurz, G. &amp; Dorn, G. J. W. (eds.) <em>Advances in Scientific Philosophy<\/em>. Amsterdam, Rodopi, 313\u2013326.<br>Moulines, C. U. (2006). Ontology, Reduction, Emergence: A General Frame. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>151<\/em>(3), 313\u2013323.<br>Moulines, C. U. &amp; Diez, J. A. (1994). Theories as Nets: Combinatorial Measurement Theory, in Humphreys, P. (ed.) <em>Patrick Suppes, Mathematical Philosopher<\/em>. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, 275\u2013297.<br>Moulines, C.U. (1996). Bridges, Constraints, and Links, in: (Balzer &amp; Moulines, 1996), 219\u2013232.<br>Murphy, G. L. (2000). Explanatory Concepts, in Keil, F.C. &amp; Wilson, R. A. (eds.), <em>Explanation and Cognition<\/em>. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 361\u2013392.<br>Murphy, G. L. &amp; Medin, D. L. (1985). The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence, <em>Psychological Review<\/em> 92, 289\u2013316.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-N\"><\/a>N<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Nagel, E. (1979). <em>The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logics of Scientific Explanations<\/em>. Hackett Publ. Comp., Cambridge.<br>Niebergall, K.-G. (2000). On the Logic of Reducibility: Axioms and Examples, <em>Erkenntnis<\/em> 53, 27\u201361.<br>Niebergall, K.-G. (2002). Structuralism, Model Theory and Reduction. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>130<\/em>(1), 135\u2013162.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-P\"><\/a>P<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Pearce, D. (1981). Is there any Theoretical Justification for a Nonstatement View of Theories. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>46<\/em>(1), 1\u201339.<br>Pearce, D. (1981). Comments on a Criterion of Theoreticity. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>48<\/em>(1), 77\u201386.<br>Pearce, D. (1981). Some Relations between Empirical Systems, <em>Epistemologie IV<\/em>, 363\u2013380.<br>Pearce, D. (1982). Stegm\u00fcller on Kuhn and Incommensurability. <em>British Journal of Philosophy of Science<\/em>, <em>33<\/em>(4), 389\u2013396.<br>Pearce, D. (1982). Logical Properties of the Structuralist Concept of Reduction, <em>Erkenntnis<\/em> 18, 307\u2013333.<br>Pearce, D. (1985). <em>Translation, Reduction and Equivalence<\/em>. Peter Lang, Frankfurt.<br>Pearce, D. &amp; Rantala, V. (1985). Continuity and Scientific discovery, <em>Communication and Cognition<\/em> 18, 15\u201323.<br>Pearce, D. &amp; Rantala, V. (1983). New Foundations for Metascience, <em>Synthese<\/em> <em>56<\/em>(1), 1\u201326.<br>Pearce, D. &amp; Rantala, V. (1984). Scientific Change, Continuity, and Problem Solving, <em>Philosophia Naturalis<\/em> 21, 389\u2013399.<br>Peacocke, C. (1992). A Study of Concepts. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.<br>Peris-Vine, L. M. (2011). Actual Models of the Chomsky Grammar, <em>Metatheoria<\/em> 1, 195\u2013225.<br>Przelewski, M. (1969). <em>The Logical of Empirical Theories<\/em>. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.<br>Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of &#8218;Meaning&#8216;, in Putnam, H. <em>Mind, Language and Reality<\/em>. Cambridge University Press, New York, 215\u2013271.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-R\"><\/a>R<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Rantala, V. (1978). The Old and the New Logic of Metascience. <em>Synthese<\/em>, <em>39<\/em>(2), 233\u2013247.<br>Rantala, V. (1980). On the Logical Basis of the Structuralist Philosophy of Science. <em>Erkenntnis<\/em>, <em>15<\/em>(3), 269\u2013286.<br>Rantala, V. (1991). Review of: W. Balzer, C. U. Moulines, and J . D. Sneed, <em>An Architectonic for Science<\/em>, <em>Synthese 86<\/em>, 297\u2013319.<br>Roseveare, N. T. (1982). <em>Mercury&#8217;s Perihelion. From the Verrier to Einstein<\/em>. Clarendon, Oxford.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-S\"><\/a>S<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Salmon, W. C. (1984). <em>Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World<\/em>. Princeton: University Press.<br>Schaffner, K. F. (1967). Approaches to Reduction. <em>Philosophy of Science,<\/em> <em>34<\/em>(2), 137\u2013147.<br>Solla Price, D. J. de (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. <em>Science<\/em> <em>149<\/em>(3683), 510\u2013515.<br>Scheibe, E. (1973). Die Erkl\u00e4rung der Keplerschen Gesetze durch Newtons Gravitationsgesetz, in: (Scheibe &amp; S\u00fc\u00dfmann, 1973), 98\u2013118.<br>Scheibe, E. &amp; S\u00fc\u00dfmann, G. (Hrsg.) (1973). <em>Einheit und Vielheit<\/em>, Festschrift f\u00fcr C. F. v. Weizs\u00e4cker, G\u00f6ttingen, Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.<br>Schurz, G., Weingartner, P. (eds.) (1998). <em>Koexistenz rivalisierender Paradigmen<\/em>: <em>Eine post-kuhnsche Bestandsaufnahme zur Struktur gegenw\u00e4rtiger Wissenschaft<\/em>. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.<br>Sneed, J. D. (1971). <em>The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics<\/em>. Dordrecht: Reidel.<br>Sneed, J. D. (1994). Structural Explanation, in Humphreys (ed.) <em>Patrick Suppes<\/em>: <em>Mathematical Philosopher<\/em>. Kluwer, Dordrecht.<br>Shapiro, S. (1991). <em>Foundations without Foundationalism. A Case for Second-Order Logic<\/em>. Clarendon Press, Oxford.<br>Stegm\u00fcller, W. (1976). <em>The Structure and Dynamics of Theories<\/em>. Springer, New York.<br>Stegm\u00fcller, W. (1979). <em>The Structuralist View of Theories.<\/em> Berlin [u.a.]: Springer.<br>Struve, H., M\u00fcller-Hill, E., Witzke, I. (2015). Berkeleys Kritik am Leibniz&#8217;schen Calculus, <em>Journal of General Philosophy of Science<\/em>, online.<br>Suppe, F. (1972). Theories, their Formulations and the Operative Imperative, <em>Synthese<\/em> 25, 129\u2013159.<br>Suppes, P. (1956). <em>Introduction to Logic<\/em>. van Nostrand, Princeton NJ.<br>Suppes, P. (1960). A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences, <em>Synthese<\/em> 12, 287\u2013300.<br>Suppes, P. (1962). Models of Data, in Nagel, E., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.), <em>Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science<\/em>, Amsterdam, North-Holland.<br>Suppes, P. (1969). <em>Studies in Methodology and Foundations of Science<\/em>. Dordrecht, Reidel.<br>Suppes, P. (1974). The Structure of Theories and the Analysis of Data, in Suppe, F. (ed.), <em>The Structure of Scientific Theories<\/em>, Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 266\u2013283.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-T\"><\/a>T<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tuomela, R. (1972). Model Theory and Empirical Interpretation of Scientific Theories, <em>Synthese<\/em> 25, 165\u2013175.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-V\"><\/a>V<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>van Benthem, J. &amp; Pearce, D. (1984). A Mathematical Characterization of Interpretation between Theories, <em>Studia Logical<\/em> <em>43<\/em>(3), 295\u2013303.<br>van Fraassen, B. (1967). Meaning Relations and Predicates, <em>Nous<\/em> 1, 161\u2013179.<br>van Fraassen, B. (1969). Meaning Relations and Predicates, <em>Nous<\/em> 3, 155-167.<br>van Fraassen, B. (1972). A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science, in Colodny, R. (ed.), <em>Paradigms and Paradoxes<\/em>: <em>The Challenge of the Quantum Domain<\/em>, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, 303\u2013366.<br>van Fraassen, B. (1980). <em>The Scientific Image<\/em>. Oxford, Clarendon.<br>van Fraassen, B. (1989). <em>Laws and Symmetry<\/em>. Hutchinson, London.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a name=\"L-W\"><\/a>W<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Westmeyer, H. (1989). <em>Psychological Theories from a Structuralist Point of View<\/em>. Berlin.<br>Wojcicki, R. (1974). Set Theoretic Representations of Empirical Phenomena. <em>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/em>, <em>3<\/em>(3), 337\u2013343.<br>Woodward, J. (1997). Explanation, Invariance, and Intervention. <em>Philosophy of Science<\/em>, <em>64<\/em>, 26\u201341.<br>Woodward, J. (2000). Explanation and Invarianz in the Special Sciences. <em>British Journal for the Philosophy of Science<\/em>, <em>51<\/em>(2), 197\u2013254.<br>Worrall, J. (1984). An Unreal Image: Review of van Fraassen (1980). <em>British Journal for the Philosophy of Science<\/em>, <em>35<\/em>(1), 65\u201380.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Literatur zum Thema \u00abWissenschaftstheorie\u00bb Die Literaturliste befindet sich noch im Aufbau! (Alphabetisch nach Autorennamen sortiert) A&nbsp;&nbsp; B&nbsp;&nbsp; C&nbsp;&nbsp; D&nbsp;&nbsp; E&nbsp;&nbsp; F&nbsp;&nbsp; G&nbsp;&nbsp; H&nbsp;&nbsp; K&nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp;&nbsp; M&nbsp;&nbsp; N&nbsp;&nbsp; P&nbsp;&nbsp; R&nbsp;&nbsp; S&nbsp;&nbsp; T&nbsp;&nbsp; V&nbsp;&nbsp; W&nbsp;&nbsp; A Adams, E. W. (1959). The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics and the Derivation of its Laws from Those of Particle Mechanics, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-fullwidth.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-17","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17"}],"version-history":[{"count":82,"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4827,"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17\/revisions\/4827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theory-of-science.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}